Praktica DCZ 3.2D Reviews from camera owners
Phil Green - United Kingdom
January 2nd 2006 - 22:00 GMT
The Praktica DCZ 3.2D camera looks good - put that as far as it goes. The camera delivers poor picture quality, very slow storing pictures, no viewfinder which makes it hard to use the camera in poor light and no good at all in bright light.
|
|
personal rating: 2%
|
Tom Mitchell - Scotland
February 10th 2006 - 18:15 GMT
No redeeming qualities at all to the Praktica DCZ 3.2D digital camera. Steer well clear except for the kids to play with. Rarely takes a sharp picture, and takes far too long to load, take, and view shots.
|
|
personal rating: 2%
|
Charles McCrimmon - Scotland
December 16th 2005 - 16:45 GMT
The Praktica DCZ 3.2D camera is small. Thats about all thats good about it.
Picture quality is really fuzzy often with lots of colour bleeding, the Auto
flash has a mind of its own, Usually flashing in well lit area's and not
flashing in darker area's, the red eye function just fails to work completely.
Nice for the kids, but as a small digital camera... No this product isnt
worth the price tag.
|
|
personal rating: 5%
|
| 
